Seventh District Foreclosure Update

Written by Emily Engel and Daniel DiFranco

Recently, the news media have been discussing an uptick in the housing market. We document some of the positive effects we have seen in the Seventh District in a series of Foreclosure Graphs, shown here and available on our Foreclosure Resource Center website.

  • Start rates, which measure the pace at which homes enter foreclosure, have come down significantly. This is a positive for the housing market, since it implies less deterioration in the ability of homeowners to meet their mortgage obligations for reasons such as job loss, inability to borrow against home equity due to falling home prices, or rising loan payments.
  • Transition rates, which measure the pace at which foreclosures get resolved, are up.
  • Finally, the inventory rate, which reflects the proportion of mortgages currently in foreclosure, is decreasing. 

Chart 1: Cook County, Illinois

EC_cook_IL_largegraph

Source: LPS Applied Analytics and FRB calculations.

 

Chart 2: Milwaukee County, Wisconsin

EC_milwaukee_WI_largegraph

Source: LPS Applied Analytics and FRB calculations.

 

Chart 3: Marion County, Indiana

EC_marion_IN_largegraph

Source: LPS Applied Analytics and FRB calculations.

 

Chart 4: Wayne County, Michigan

EC_wayne_MI_largegraph

Source: LPS Applied Analytics and FRB calculations.

 

Chart 5: Polk County, Iowa

EC_polk_IA_largegraph

Source: LPS Applied Analytics and FRB calculations.

Posted in Foreclosure | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Community Development and Policy Studies Update

Written by Emily Engel

This blog is a summary of Community Development and Policy Studies topics in the Seventh District from the latest CDPS Survey.

According to the latest CDPS survey:

  • The biggest issue impacting the health of housing markets in the Seventh District, especially in low- and moderate-income communities (LMI) is the oversupply of vacant homes. Additionally, contacts mentioned that the number of homeowners whose mortgages are under water (balance greater than the value of the home), the continuing high rate of foreclosures, and high unemployment also negatively impact the housing market. Further exacerbating ailing housing markets is that in judicial foreclosure states like Illinois and Indiana[1] , the long foreclosure process keeps defaulted mortgagors in their homes long after they have ceased making payments. While the judicial process slows the rate at which foreclosed homes become vacant, it also creates an overhang of supply of foreclosed homes whose occupants have little motivation to maintain them. Illinois Governor Pat Quinn recently signed into law Senate Bill 16, aimed at fast tracking foreclosures of abandoned homes. Quinn explained that, “This law will help restore neighborhoods and property values while fighting crime and blight by decreasing the time a home sits empty and getting it back on the market quickly.”[2]
  • The demand for business loans in LMI communities over the four to six weeks prior to the release of the Beige Book had remained relatively steady.
  • While many contacts reported credit tightening in LMI communities over the previous four to six weeks, some argued that availability of credit in LMI areas had not changed, but continued to remain low for a variety of reasons including the following: fewer traditional lenders in the market; less available credit; appraisal problems; and higher credit score requirements. Additionally, some contacts noted that demand is low for loans, reflecting the effects of unemployment and foreclosures on LMI communities.
  • There are many challenges associated with revitalizing LMI communities, but most contacts cited employment as the biggest one. Jobs are needed and, importantly, they need to be accessible via public transportation. Employment at all skill levels is an issue.
  • Research shows that many indicators of poverty—such as poor education, inadequate housing, racism, and poor nutrition—are also indicators of poor health. Where someone lives is also closely associated with their longevity and risk for disease. Increasing access to health care, while essential, is not sufficient to improve health. Given this, community development contacts cite both education and access to care as two key ways to help foster improved health. Improving education can take many forms: from building strong partnerships with municipal governments and advocates, to identifying partnership opportunities with the financial community, to focusing on early education and educational attainment. Likewise, access can take many forms, including: mobile health care clinics, access to fresh food in food deserts (communities lacking grocery stores and produce markets), and better-quality housing. Although much focus is put on physical health, contacts noted that mental health issues also need attention in LMI communities.
  • Several contacts highlighted items that were more state dependent: (1) Michigan is very dependent on the auto industry; (2) the Wisconsin economy is sustained by a robust agricultural market; and (3) the fiscal condition of the State of Illinois is likely to adversely affect employment as well as schools, by limiting the incentives it can offer to new businesses or existing businesses to hire and/or train employees.

 


[1] Iowa and Wisconsin are both judicial and non-judicial foreclosure states, while Michigan is a non-judicial foreclosure state–[foreclosures do not need to go through the court system].

Posted in Beige Book | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Regional Home Ownership Preservation Initiative

Written by Emily Engel

On January 30, 2013, the Chicago Fed hosted a conference organized by the Woodstock Institute and other partners in the Regional Home Ownership Preservation Initiative (RHOPI) entitled, “Single-Family Rental Housing: Managing the Next Step of the Foreclosure Crisis”, which focused on Chicago’s affordable rental housing market (single-family to 50-unit buildings).  RHOPI, a multi-year program, was initially launched by the Chicago Fed, the Chicago Community Trust, and Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago in early 2008.  Many organizations including Woodstock, IFF, Housing Action Illinois, the Metropolitan Mayors’ Caucus, The Metropolitan Planning Council, Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning among many others, have stepped forward to lead efforts to implement measures to alleviate effects of the financial and foreclosure crisis in the interim.

In all, approximately 80 organizations, comprising national and community banks; suburban, Chicago City, Cook County, Illinois state, and federal agencies; the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency; private foundations; and many nonprofit and advocacy groups identify themselves as formal RHOPI partners. Many more have participated in on-the-ground redevelopment, housing counseling, and loss mitigation efforts for metropolitan Chicago neighborhoods that have been among the hardest hit by the crisis.

The conference agenda included housing, consumer advocacy, and (related) policy experts, among others. Terry Mazany, president and CEO of Chicago Community Trust, started by noting the location of Chicagoland’s most impacted areas during the foreclosure crisis over the past five years, and acknowledging that the rate of foreclosures is once again accelerating. He explained that foreclosed homes are not spread out like “peanut butter” across the region with one every couple blocks. Rather, they are lumped together in certain areas. This concentration of empty, foreclosed, single-family houses, coupled with a need for more affordable housing units, led to the idea of converting vacant houses into rental properties.

The volume of households that have lost homes to foreclosure has led to rapidly increasing demand for rental housing throughout the Chicago metro area; governments and many groups concerned about the rising number of vacant houses have cautiously agreed that renting vacant homes represents an elegant solution to many problems at once, acknowledging that managing a large-scale scattered-site rental operation presents its own challenges.

Alan Mallach, the keynote speaker and a renowned expert on housing policy at The Brookings Institution and the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, explained that there has always been a large number of houses for rent (approximately one-third of all rental housing). However, absentee ownership has historically been a “mom-and-pop” industry; over 90% of these rentals were owned by private individuals in the 1990s. Since the foreclosure crisis, there has been a gradual shift toward large-scale public and private rental operations. Over the past two years, as housing markets have bottomed out, large bulk purchases have become more common. Additionally, mortgages and notes are also being bought. While the sale of mortgages is hardly new, more recently the mortgages are being purchased by investors who then foreclose and rent the units.

What are the ramifications? According to Mallach, first, the trend signals less home ownership, a movement already under way as young workers seek flexibility, and the option to move to another region to accept a job if necessary. The trend also means more absentee investors and, in turn, increases in what are commonly known as “walk aways.” When a large investor purchases a portfolio, sight unseen, they may simply walk away from a property that they do not feel is worth their time to resell or rent. Since the houses that are the most undesirable tend to be in the lowest value areas, “walk aways” hurt the areas that need the most help.

Mallach suggested that a rental registration ordinance might help solve the problem by establishing accountability for a property. Some renter ordinances are ineffective, as they rely on penalties rather than incentives to encourage participation. A recent New York City study revealed that only 23% of renters lease units registered in their system.  Mallach gave a few examples of ways to make a registration ordinance successful, assuming the city or village has a Web-based property information system. When a property turns over, the city contacts the new owner, stating to provide details about the rental registration ordinance.  Owners must either provide an affidavit of home ownership, if the property is to be owner-occupied, or register and pay a fee, if the intent is to lease the property. If the city discovers later that a home ownership affidavit was signed on a rental property, it would impose a penalty on the owner. Once the rental registration ordinance is created, the city would also need to contact owners of previously unregistered rental properties. While this may add transaction costs and disincentives to a young industry, Mallach suggested that a viable alternative would be to make the registration process free, as well as, on limited basis, requirements such as inspections, to encourage compliance.  By using incentives versus penalties, cost-conscious but otherwise willing (to comply) landlords may be more inclined to register, and the city would be able concentrate more resources on problem landlords.

Additionally there were panels and breakout sessions that discussed: local issues, solutions, best practices, success stories, property management/local policy, and incentives. To close the day the 10th District County Commissioner, Bridget Gainer, discussed single-family rental housing and the Cook County Land Bank. Please view the Cook County Land Bank Proposal from 2012 to learn more about the project.

To learn more about these issues please see the Metropolitan Planning Council‘s white paper released in January 2013 ‘Managing Single-Family Rental Homes, The Next Challenge in the Foreclosure Crisis.’ In a future CDPS blog, we will discuss the Real Estate Owned (REO) to rental market in more detail.

Posted in RHOPI | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Green Bay Profile

Written by Emily Engel

Brief History on Green Bay

Green Bay is the oldest settlement in Wisconsin.[1]  Settled by the French in the 17th century due to its strategic location at the junction of the Fox and Wisconsin Rivers.  Green Bay is also a Lake Michigan port and connects, via the Fox and Wisconsin Rivers to the Mississippi River, and, ultimately the Gulf of Mexico.  Established as a trading post for fur and agricultural goods, Green Bay eventually transitioned to dairy production, and finally into a factory town catering first to the lumber industry and ultimately paper production.[2]  Today, with its century-old paper industry in decline, Green Bay has transitioned into a modern city with a diverse economy that includes many service sectors.  However, with almost one in five jobs still in some form of manufacturing, Green Bay to a large degree retains its manufacturing heritage.

Why Green Bay was Chosen for the Industrial Cities Initiative (ICI)

Green Bay was chosen for the ICI study because it typifies a Resurgent Industrial City – i.e., one that has broadened and diversified its employment base, and scores highly in measures of well-being.  To learn more about the four categories (Resurgent Industrial Cities, Transforming Cities, Fading Cities, and Overwhelmed Cities) into  which the ten ICI cities were organized, please read the Industrial Cities Initiative: Working Paper Summary.

Manufacturing History

Compared with the nation’s manufacturing employment trend, Green Bay has maintained proportionately far more manufacturing jobs, as depicted in the chart below.  Currently, the average of the employed population working in manufacturing among all U.S. cities is 11.0%, while Green Bay has 18.8% of its employed population working in the manufacturing.  Since 1970, the percentage employed in manufacturing for all U.S. workers has fallen from 26.1% to 11.2%, representing a 56.9% drop.  However, since 1970, the percentage employed in manufacturing for Green Bay workers has fallen from 27.5% to 18.8%, representing only a 31.8% drop.[3]

Green Bay & US Percentage Employed in Manufacturing

Future of Manufacturing

Despite its relative health and adaptation to a changing global economy, Green Bay shares a key issue with many ICI cities in that its education system may not fully serve the next generation of potential manufacturing workers, who must have complex technical skills, but do not necessarily plan to obtain a four-year college degree.  As manufacturing has not been actively or positively promoted as a career path, the current school-age generation may accept false stereotypes of manufacturing as a dead-end career.  The NEW (NorthEast Wisconsin) Manufacturing Alliance was created to help build a better image of manufacturing and promote the industry as having a solid career path.  NEW Manufacturing Alliance “is a group of manufactures, working with educational institutions, workforce development boards, chambers of commerce and state organizations to promote manufacturing in our Northeast Wisconsin Region.”[4]   NEW Manufacturing Alliance has four main objectives: (1) build a positive perception of manufacturing; (2) create and grow partnerships with schools, media, and other outlets; (3) promote workforce development; and (4) advance collaboration efforts that support the industry.  City leaders expressed hope that the NEW Manufacturing Alliance and other organizations devoted to improving manufacturing in Green Bay will help the city’ manufacturing industry thrive.

 


[1] National Park Service, Survey of Historic Sites and Buildings, Green Bay, Wisconsin. http://www.cr.nps.gov/history/online_books/fauna2/sitee33.htm.

[2] Andrew E. Kersten, Untold Significance: A Commemorative History of Green Bay, Voyageur Magazine, Winter/Spring 2005, Volume 21, Number 2.

[3] Data is from Industrial Cities Initiative Case Study Data, http://www.chicagofed.org/digital_assets/others/events/2012/ici_symposium/ici_data.pdf

[4] http://www.newmfgalliance.org/

Posted in Green Bay, Industrial Cities Initiative | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Introducing the Michigan Economy

Written by William Testa

Followers of the Community Development and Policy Studies blog will be interested to learn that the Detroit Branch of the Chicago Fed have launched a blog that focuses on the Michigan Economy. This blog will serve as a portal for our numerous activities concerning Michigan, ranging from economic analysis to community development and economic education. Moreover, the Michigan Economy blog will report on the many meetings and conferences that are held at the Detroit Branch. And presentations by outside experts, as well as discussions about them, will be posted on the blog. Bookmark the blog to stay on top of Fed commentary on Michigan’s economy and to learn about our upcoming events at the Detroit Branch.

Posted in Detroit, Michigan | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Leveraging Resources for Small Businesses in Detroit

Written by Robin Newberger and Maude Toussaint-Comeau

During the past year, the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago’s Community Development and Policy Studies division has been studying the changing financial landscape of Detroit and its implications for access to financial services and lending to small businesses in the city’s low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. As documented in the study, in the city of Detroit, the number of banks, both large and small, has fallen sharply over the past two decades.  This contrasts with trends across the U.S. that show a decline in smaller banks (less than $1 billion in assets) but an increase in large banks (more than $1 billion in assets) since the Riegle Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act was passed 1994. Today, the number of banks per person in Detroit is comparatively lower than in other cities with declining populations.  According to this study, low- and moderate-income census tracts in the city – the neighborhoods where residents tend to have relatively lower incomes – have even fewer bank branches than would be predicted given the population, median income and other characteristics of those neighborhoods.  While greater bank access is an indicator of the well-being of a community, the same study has found that bank presence does explain, in part, the extent to which small business lending occurs in low and moderate-income neighborhoods (but not middle/upper income neighborhoods).

Bank Branch Openings and Closings: City of Detroit

Click to Enlarge
Source: Authors’ calculations based on FDIC Summary of Deposits

On October 16–17, the Chicago Fed, the Michigan Bankers Association and the New Economy Initiative for Southeast Michigan co-sponsored a symposium in Detroit that brought together business experts and owners, policymakers, bankers and other funders to address the potential role that financial institutions and other organizations can play in leveraging resources for small businesses in Detroit. Over the course of the two-day symposium, presenters underscored that many resources exist for small businesses in Detroit and surrounding counties, covering legal, financial, management and marketing services.  Foundations, city planners, the state and other civic organizations have been actively involved in developing new resources for small businesses.  As presenters discussed the challenges to increasing bank lending for small businesses in Detroit, many of the speakers and audience members offered ideas for drawing banks more closely into the conversation about neighborhood revitalization and leveraging bank and nonbank re­sources to finance small businesses.

For a more detailed summary of the symposium please read the Chicago Fed Letter co-authored by Robin Newberger and Maude Toussaint-Comeau Developing Small Businesses and Leveraging Resources in Detroit. To view materials from the Developing Small Businesses and Leveraging Resources in Detroit events page on the Chicago Fed website.

Posted in Detroit | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Federal Agencies Align to Support Regional Growth


In March of this year, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) released its Territorial Review of the Chicago Tri-State Metro Region.[1] The first time a U.S. region has been reviewed by the OECD, the findings gave perspective to challenges familiar to the region’s leaders and residents. The Review area includes 21 counties stretching from Wisconsin into Indiana (Map 1) and encompasses more than 2,000 local governments.   According to the OECD, these reviews offer analysis and guidance to national and sub-national governments seeking to strengthen territorial development policies and governance.  The OECD’s work centers on regional issues that address the spatial implication of public and private policy challenges, including governance, innovation, and urban development. These bodies of work include both thematic reports and reports on specific countries or regions, of which the Chicago Tri-State Metro Region is one of many.

Click to Enlarge
Source: OECD elaboration with data from Census 2000 County and County Equivalent Areas Cartographic Boundary Files, US Census Bureau

More than 300 pages in length, the OECD’s report is premised on two key assumptions:

  1. The Tri-State Metro Region’s economic development strategies to date are not sufficient to meet the demands of the global marketplace.
  2. This economy extends beyond the borders of any one jurisdiction and there is a mismatch between how political/geographical boundaries are defined and how the functioning economy actually works.

The report[2] synthesizes the region’s international position relative to its peers and highlights four areas that require attention if the region wishes to remain globally competitive:

  • Matching Skills to Jobs
  • Innovation and Entrepreneurship
  • Transportation and Logistics
  • Green Growth[3]

Eight federal agencies convened at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago on October 29, 2012 to present the ways in which their agencies’ work aligned with the objectives of the Territorial Review. The regional directors, or their deputies, of these agencies , including:  the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Rural Development (USDA-RD), the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the U.S. Economic Development Administration (EDA), U.S. Employment and Training Administration (ETA),U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Transit Administration (FTA), U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) – presented their programs to an audience of county and municipal leaders, as well as economic development agencies, chambers of commerce, metropolitan planning organizations and academic institutions representing the 21 county area covered by the report, with the goal of helping the affected communities develop durable regional economies.

Framework for Regionalism

The publication of the report has spurred local communities and non-profits to begin to align their resources.  Therefore, the federal agencies active in the region are also compelled to align their efforts to support regional economic growth.  As a first step, the agencies have designated a single point of contact to streamline access to the federal government on issues of regional importance.

Jeannette Tomayo, Regional Director for the EDA stressed in her opening remarks that the “boundaries of the region are defined by issues and by the affected people and are ever-shifting.  The conversation is about inclusion, representation and direct access to the federal government.”

The remarks of Thomas Guevara, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Regional Affairs at the EDA who was not able to attend due to Hurricane Sandy, were read by Ms. Tomayo and highlighted the urgency of addressing the findings of the OECD report.  Noting the high level of economic interdependence amongst the region’s 11.5 million people, “the tri-state region is a global economic powerhouse but it is also significantly underperforming.”  Data presented by Dr. Lance Pressl, Senior Policy Fellow at the Institute for Work and the Economy demonstrated that growth in the Chicago region (GRP) has not kept pace with that of the rest of the country. (Chart below)

Ration of Chicago per Capita GRP Growth to U.S.

Click to Enlarge

In addition to describing their individual programs, some presenters highlighted existing initiatives of regional cooperation:

  • Laura Frerichs, Director of the University of Illinois Research Park spoke about an upcoming convening of Tech Park directors from across the region.  Tech Parks/small business incubators take research from universities and turn it into economic development by creating new jobs and companies.  Incubators themselves can be catalysts for economic development and wealth creation that supports regional growth.
  • Antonio Riley, Regional Director for HUD, spoke about his agency’s Sustainable Communities initiative which encourages municipalities to work across borders and plan collaboratively and regionally.[4] Director Riley also spoke of the Gary and Region Investment Project (GRIP) which is working to attract national attention and resources to the area.[5]

Finally, as a direct response to the report, the Tri State Alliance for Regional Development was created.  Housed at the Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce, which commissioned the Review, the Alliance is charged to create and execute an implementation plan for the Review’s recommendations.

Jeremiah Boyle, Managing Director for Economic Development at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago emphasized the Federal Reserve’s regional presence and its connection to individual communities through financial institutions.  He also referenced the Community Development and Policy Studies Industrial Cities Initiative that has examined 10 industrial cities across the 7th District.  Those cities that are doing well, he said, “are those that are aware of something larger than themselves.”

Suggested actions for the region are included in the final chapter of the OECD’s report.  In this chapter, the role of the federal government is not clearly stated.  However, the report clearly states “In the Tri-State region, the sheer range of public and private stakeholders with a vested interest in seeing (public policy issues) resolved dictates that policy advice be directed at this broader set of public and private actors operating on behalf of the Tri-State Region’s residents.”

All acknowledged that this is a long-term, perhaps multi-generational, effort.  In the short term, the regional leaders must report their progress to the OECD territorial development policy committee before the end of the year.

To learn more about:

The OECD and its work: http://www.oecd.org/

The Tri-State Territorial Review: http://www.oecd.org/unitedstates/oecdterritorialreviewsthechicagotri-statemetropolitanarea.htm

The Tri-State Regional Alliance: http://chicagolandchamber.org/wdk_cc/programs_and_advocacy/tri-state_alliance.jsp

The presenting agencies:

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Industrial Cities Initiative: http://www.chicagofed.org/webpages/events/2012/industrial_cities.cfm


[1] http://oecdwash.org/chicagoreview/

[2] Ibid

[3] Ibid, page 33

[4] http://www.huduser.org/portal/sustainability/home.html

[5] http://www.metroplanning.org/work/project/19

Posted in Industrial Cities Initiative | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Industrial Tour of Northwest Indiana

Chicago Fed President Charles Evans recently delivered the keynote address at the Lakeshore Chamber of Commerce 8th Annual Business Expo and Luncheon in Hammond, Indiana.  The audience included more than 300 local chamber members, mayors of several Northwest Indiana cities, businessmen, academics and local residents. President Evans and several of the Fed’s senior staff also toured projects that represent significant investments – both public and private – in Northwest, Indiana.

The Northwest Indiana Regional Development Authority (RDA) started the day showcasing a number of projects along the Lake Michigan shoreline, including the Wolf Lake project in Whiting, Indiana. These projects, along with the runway expansion project at the Gary Airport, will leverage a $250 million grant from the State of Indiana to support more than $650 million in investments projects that will help revitalize Northwest Indiana communities.

Chicago Fed staff also toured local industrial facilities, including the BP oil refinery in Whiting, Indiana; and the ArcelorMittal steel mill in East Chicago, Indiana. BP’s management provided a tour of its facility, highlighting the $5 billion, seven-year refinery modernization project. The project represents the largest single private investment ever made in Indiana, creating thousands of jobs during construction and has significant implications for the national, regional and local economies.

Northwest Indiana Bus Tour Image

Charles Evans, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (second from right) is joined at the BP Oil Refinery in Whiting, Indiana by (left to right) Jeremiah Boyle, Managing Director of Economic Development, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago; Dave Ryan, Executive Director of the Lakeshore Chamber of Commerce; Daniel Sullivan, Executive Vice President and Director of Research, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago; and James Shoriak, Project Director for BP’s Modernization Project at the Whiting Refinery.

Click to Enlarge
©2012 Lakeshore Chamber of Commerce, photo by: Armando Gomez

The group also toured ArcelorMittal’s steel mill in East Chicago, Indiana (formerly known as Inland Steel).  In addition to the dramatic visual experience of the steelmaking process, the group heard from the company’s managers and employees about the workforce trends, innovation in the industry, and the challenges and opportunities of continuing to produce steel in the Midwest.

The day’s activities were arranged by the Chicago Fed’s Community Development and Policy Studies division as part of their mission to understand and promote community and economic development throughout the 7thFederal Reserve District.

Posted in Industrial Cities Initiative, Northwest Indiana | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

CDFI Fund 2012 Awards to Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFI)

The Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFI) Fund of the U.S. Department of the Treasury recently  announced the largest set of awards in total to CDFIs in its history—over $185 million to 210 organizations in more than 40 states and the District of Columbia.

Through the CDFI Program’s Financial Assistance, Technical Assistance, and  Native American CDFI Assistance (NACA) award programs, the CDFI Fund invests in and builds the capacity of for-profit and non-profit community-based lending organizations known as Community Development Financial Institutions, or CDFIs. These organizations, which must meet criteria specified by the U.S. Treasury Department and undergo formal certification, serve rural and urban low-income people and communities across the nation that lack adequate access to affordable financial products and services. Awards are granted through a competitive application process annually.

Additionally, in FYs 2011 and 2012, the Healthy Food Financing Initiative (HFFI) served as a supplemental funding opportunity under the CDFI Program for eligible CDFIs to expand their healthy food-focused financing activities. The HFFI is an interagency initiative involving the CDFI Fund, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture to increase the supply of and demand for nutritious foods in low-income urban and rural areas in the United States.[1]

During the economic downturn, CDFIs saw demand for their products increase dramatically, as available credit from mainstream financial institutions contracted. A recent article in Profitwise News and Views, “Small Business Access to Capital: Alternative Resources Bridging the Gap”, describes the challenges and opportunities faced by one Chicago-based CDFI, ACCION Chicago, an award recipient in this most recent round. While lending standards are beginning to show signs of easing, [2] CDFIs continue to experience elevated levels of activity, with more than 50% reporting an increase in demand—a level not seen since the first quarter of 2009 (see Chart below).

The CDFI Fund remains an important source of capital for organizations providing affordable housing, home mortgage, small business, and consumer lending products, as well as financial education and other services to borrowers in underserved communities.
Click to enlarge
Source: Opportunity Finance Network: CDFI Market Conditions Report (3rd & 4th Quarter 2011 Report II – Detailed Tables)

CDFIs in the Seventh District that received FY2012 awards from the CDFI Fund are:
ACCION Chicago, Chicago, IL
Capital Fund Services, Lansing, MI
Chi Ishobak, Inc., Dowagiac, MI
Chicago Community Loan Fund, Chicago, IL
Communicating Arts Credit Union, Detroit, MI
Community Assets for People, Stevens Point, WI
Community Investment Corporation, Chicago, IL
Community Investment Support Fund, Bloomfield Hills, MI
First American Capital Corporation, West Allis, WI
Forward Community Investments, Madison, WI
Hmong Wisconsin Chamber of Commerce, Milwaukee, WI
IFF, Chicago, IL
Invest Detroit Foundation, Detroit, MI
Legacy Redevelopment Corporation, Milwaukee, WI
Milwaukee Economic Development Corporation, Milwaukee, WI
NATCO Credit Union, Richmond, IN
National Community Investment Fund, Chicago, IL
Neighborhood Finance Corporation, Des Moines, IA
Northern Shores Loan Fund, Inc., Harbor Springs, MI
Northwest Side Community Development Corporation, Milwaukee, WI
Pan American Bank, Chicago, IL
Ways to Work, Milwaukee, WI
Wisconsin Women’s Business Initiative Corporation, Milwaukee, WI

For more information on the CDFI announcement please review the release.

[1] www.cdfifund.gov.
[2] www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/snloansurvey/201205/fullreport.pdf.
Posted in CDFI | Tagged | Leave a comment

Community Development and Policy Studies (CDPS) tours target communities of the Local Initiatives Support Corporation’s (LISC) New Communities Program

On Tuesday, July 24, the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago’s CDPS division took a bus tour with LISC New Communities Program director Chris Brown to several projects under the New Communities Program. The tour started in South Chicago, moved into Englewood, and ended in Woodlawn. The group toured a private residential home, viewed two affordable housing complexes, an assisted living community, and visited an urban organic farm. The tour ended at a local restaurant, where the staff heard from leaders at the Quad Communities Development Corporation (QCDC) and the CARA Program.

The first stop was at a house that was built by Claretian Associates, a group that each year “serve(s) more than 2,500 families by helping them access better housing, other housing resources and referrals, and the tools they need to build a better community in South Chicago.” The highly energy-efficient houses are part of the New Homes for South Chicago program and were built in multiple phases. In addition to single-family housing, the organization develops high-quality, affordable rental housing, including the Casa Kirk Apartments, and assisted living communities, such as the Victory Center Assisted Living complex. As a cultural amenity, and as part of strategy to promote safer, healthier communities, the organization also developed an arts center, and has plans for further cultural facilities.

Click to Enlarge
©2012 federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, photo by: Katherine Theoharopoulos

The second stop was at Growing Home, which provides “transitional employment and training to Chicagoans who have multiple barriers to employment, such as, having been previously homeless or incarcerated.” Growing Home is an organic farm, a (thoughtful) reuse of formerly blighted Englewood property that provides supplemental employment in the community, as well as fresh produce. The farm sells to the Green City Market, specialty restaurants, and community residents. Additionally, Growing Home has worked with Link (which provides public assistance through stored value cards) so that one day of the week, Link card holders pay half price when purchasing any fresh produce. Fresh produce is so much in demand in this community that the farm, which produced 6.5 tons of produce in 2011, regularly sells out during normal business hours. Growing Home is expanding by opening another plot of land to farm; with a single farm, the group’s revenue grew from $662,697 in 2008 to $926,615 in 2010. [1]

Click to Enlarge

©2012 federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, photo by: Katherine Theoharopoulos

The second to last stop was to the Grove Parc Housing Development, which (the organization) Preservation of Affordable Housing (POAH) acquired in 2008. “POAH has worked collaboratively with a broad range of stakeholders to develop a comprehensive plan which will address the failed Grove Parc development and revitalize the broader Woodlawn neighborhood.” This development is the beginning of a multi-phase project that will focus on changing the community through improved housing and infrastructure, education, economic development, and public safety. While a few of the housing structures have already been built, there are plans for more mixed-income housing, a community resource center, and a tentative plan for building a hotel to draw additional business and commercial traffic into Woodlawn.

The tour ended with a lunch held at Norman’s Bistro, a business that was supported by QCDC. QCDC brings together residents, organizations, businesses and institutions within North Kenwood, Oakland, and portions of Douglas and Grand Boulevard to plan, guide, support, and monitor human infrastructure and community development activities in order to create a sustainable, healthy, mixed-income neighborhood. A presenter from the CARA Program (a workforce development organization) discussed the group’s impact on employment in the region, as well as savings derived from hundreds of workers being removed from public assistance and no longer using various services aimed at homeless and unemployed residents.CARA’s mission is to “prepare and inspire motivated individuals to break the cycle of homelessness and poverty, transform their lives, strengthen communities, and forge paths to real and lasting success”. They reported 232 permanent job placements, 252 transitional job placements, and a 77% retention rate for those employed at least one year. [2]

 


[1] Growing Home 2010 Annual Report.
[2] Performance Update as of December 31, 2011.
Posted in LISC | Tagged , | Leave a comment